Under current rules, his company had a 2 year buffer to evaluate new hires before they could bring unfair dismissal claims. If Labour’s proposals became reality, that safety net would vanish. Employees could challenge dismissal decisions from their first day on the job, potentially exposing Simon’s business to increased risks and significant costs.
“Right now, a bad hire costs us time and productivity,” Simon explained to his leadership team during a strategy meeting. “But if this becomes law, the financial and reputational costs could skyrocket.”
Simon’s CFO laid out the numbers: defending an unfair dismissal claim could cost the business thousands of pounds in legal fees, and pay outs for successful claims could exceed £13,000. Add in management time, operational disruption, and possible damage to the company’s reputation, and the potential financial burden was alarming.
“This could get expensive—fast,” the CFO warned.
Simon knew they couldn’t wait for the law to change. They needed to act now to safeguard the business.
The Risks for Businesses
Simon identified several key risks that day-one unfair dismissal protections could bring:
1. Higher Legal Exposure
Without a qualifying period, any dismissal could lead to a tribunal claim. Even if the company won, the legal fees and lost productivity during the process would be significant.
2. Increased Settlements
Many businesses opt to settle disputes early to avoid tribunal costs and reputational damage. Settlements often range between £5,000 and £30,000, a steep price for resolving disputes quickly.
3. Reputational Damage
In a competitive industry, negative publicity from a mishandled dismissal could deter top talent and clients. Simon knew rebuilding trust in the market could require a costly PR strategy.
4. Strained Resources
Smaller teams, particularly management, would face additional administrative burdens to ensure dismissals were handled fairly and legally.
Simon’s team needed a plan—not just to avoid unnecessary costs, but to use the impending changes as an opportunity to strengthen their business.
A Proactive Strategy for Change
Simon and his leadership team implemented a series of proactive measures designed to mitigate risks and control costs:
1. Formalising Probation Periods
The company introduced a structured probationary framework with clear performance metrics. New hires received detailed feedback at set intervals, and any concerns were documented thoroughly.
Cost Impact: Simon invested in software to streamline performance tracking and documentation which would save the company countless hours in future disputes.
2. Comprehensive Manager Training
The leadership team rolled out mandatory training sessions for all managers, focusing on fair dismissal procedures, legal compliance, and effective communication.
Cost Impact: The training cost for external consultants, Simon viewed it as essential. “One legal case could cost us twice that,” he explained.
3. Updating Policies and Contracts
Employment contracts were revised to include clear terms around probation periods, dismissal procedures, and expectations for both parties.
Cost Impact: An external review ensured policies were watertight. This upfront investment reduced the risk of costly claims in the future.
4. Preparing for Settlements
Simon set aside a contingency fund for early settlements, knowing it would often be cheaper than lengthy tribunal disputes. Settling early could save the business up to 70% of potential costs, especially in cases with weak defences.
5. Improving Employee Communication
By fostering transparency, Simon aimed to reduce the likelihood of disputes. Regular check-ins and open feedback channels helped employees feel heard, even during tough conversations.
Cost Impact: Minimal—mostly management time and effort, but it greatly reduced the risk of conflicts escalating to claims.
The Financial Benefits of Early Preparation
Six months into their new approach, Simon could already see the difference. A recent dismissal tested their system: a new hire failed to meet performance expectations despite clear feedback and support. Thanks to the documentation and structured process, the dismissal was smooth, and the employee left without dispute.
Simon estimated that, without these changes, the situation could have led to a claim costing thousands of pounds in legal fees and a potential settlement. Instead, the company avoided unnecessary expenses and maintained its reputation as a fair employer.
Projecting the Costs of Inaction
Simon’s team calculated the potential financial impact if they hadn’t prepared:
In total, Simon estimated unpreparedness could cost his business £60,000–£100,000 each year—a figure they couldn’t afford to absorb.
A Positive Outlook
By taking early action, Simon not only protected his business but also created a stronger, fairer workplace. Employees appreciated the clear expectations and transparent communication, and managers felt more confident handling difficult situations.
“When day-one rights come into effect, we’ll be ready,” Simon told his team. “Not just to avoid costs, but to lead with fairness and integrity.”
For Simon, preparation wasn’t just about saving money—it was about building a resilient business that could thrive no matter what changes lay ahead.
For our lovely HR Pulse clients, as a reminder, we have a suite of tools and documents to enable people managers to manoeuvre their way through recruitment, probationary and performance management issues and much more!
If you are not yet one of our lovely clients, and would like to find out more about HR Pulse or to discuss your individual requirements which we can tailor to meet your needs, then please click on the GET IN TOUCH! button above for further details.
We are here to help!